Your family foundation designed a scholarship for a specific student. The question is whether that student can actually find it, access it, and complete the application. For many foundations, the answer is no, not because the program lacks merit, but because the language, design, or outreach creates friction that filters out the very students the scholarship was built for.
Whether your foundation is newly established or has been giving for generations, how your scholarship is built either invites or unintentionally excludes the applicants you most want to reach. This guide walks through the core principles that help family foundations close that gap.
Does your scholarship language tell underrepresented students they belong?
Many potential applicants self-select out of scholarships, not because they aren’t eligible, but because the language of your application makes them feel like they don’t belong.
Use plain, inclusive language:
- Avoid jargon, academic buzzwords, or overly formal philanthropic language
- Write at an 8th-grade reading level to support broader comprehension
- Use “you” and “your” instead of passive constructions (“applicants must…”)
- Let your family’s authentic voice come through: be personal, not institutional
Avoid gatekeeping language:
Instead of: “Must demonstrate extraordinary leadership in academic research.” Try: “Tell us how you’ve made a difference in your school, home, or community.”
Instead of: “The Foundation Board seeks exemplary candidates who epitomize excellence.” Try: “Our family wants to support students who care about making positive change.”
Add context and encouragement:
Explain why you’re asking for sensitive details (income, race or ethnicity, family background) and how that information will be used. Build trust by sharing your family foundation’s values and commitment to fairness.
For example: “We ask about your family’s financial situation because our foundation was created to support students who might not otherwise be able to afford college. This information helps us identify students who will benefit most from our support.”
Is your application accessible to students with disabilities?
An inaccessible application shuts out qualified students who use assistive technologies or require alternative formats.
To make your family foundation’s application accessible:
- Ensure compatibility with screen readers (use semantic HTML, label form fields clearly)
- Provide alt text for images and icons
- Avoid time limits or autosave timeouts that penalize students with cognitive or physical disabilities
- Allow applicants to save progress and return later
- Offer audio, video, or visual submission options for essays
- Include clear accessibility contact information or a request accommodation option
According to the CDC, 1 in 4 adults in the United States lives with a disability. ADA compliance isn’t optional. It is essential to reaching all qualified students.
Are your application process and timeline designed for equity?
Equity begins before your application opens. Every part of your process affects who applies and who makes it to the finish line.
Application timing:
- Align deadlines with FAFSA, academic calendars, and seasonal schedules
- Allow at least four to six weeks for submission
- Avoid heavy holiday periods and final exam windows
- Account for students who work jobs or manage family responsibilities
Format flexibility:
- Allow students to choose from text, video, or visual formats for essays or personal stories
- Do not require expensive portfolio materials or professional formatting
- Accept documents in multiple formats (PDF, Word, images)
- Offer phone or email support during key deadline weeks
Rubric transparency:
- Publish your evaluation criteria, so students understand how applications will be judged
- Share what your family foundation values (leadership, service, resilience, creativity)
- Train family members and reviewers on bias reduction
- Consider blind review processes where appropriate
Are you reaching students through the right outreach channels?
Even the most inclusive application won’t matter if the right students never hear about it. Family foundations often have the advantage of personal networks. Use them thoughtfully.
Outreach ideas:
- Partner with high schools, HBCUs, HSIs, tribal colleges, and community organizations
- Ask family members to share in their professional and personal networks
- Work with guidance counselors in underserved communities
- Promote in multiple languages if serving multilingual populations
- Use student ambassadors or past recipients as advocates
- List your scholarship on mobile-friendly platforms and scholarship databases
Reduce barriers to awareness:
- Host information sessions (virtual or in-person) for prospective applicants
- Ensure your foundation website clearly promotes the scholarship
- Make the application easy to find, not buried in a footer or linked from a single blog post
- Create simple one-pagers that counselors can share with students directly
Are you building long-term trust with the communities you want to reach?
It’s not just about one application cycle. Applicants from underrepresented backgrounds want to see that your family foundation’s commitment to equity is ongoing and authentic.
Show your values over time:
- Feature diverse past recipients in your storytelling and communications
- Publish information about who has benefited from your scholarships
- Commit to continuous improvement through applicant feedback surveys
- Share your family’s why: why does equity matter to your foundation specifically?
Consider your selection committee:
- Does your review panel reflect diverse perspectives?
- Have you invited past scholars, community members, or educators to participate?
- Are family members trained on inclusive evaluation practices?
What unique advantages do family foundations have in building inclusive scholarship programs?
Family foundations have strengths in creating inclusive scholarships that corporate and institutional programs often lack.
Personal connection. Unlike corporate or institutional programs, family foundations can build genuine, lasting relationships with scholars. This personal touch can make students from underrepresented backgrounds feel truly valued and supported, not just funded.
Flexibility. Family foundations aren’t beholden to corporate branding or institutional bureaucracy. You can move quickly, adjust criteria, and respond to community needs with agility that larger programs can’t match.
Values-driven identity. Students connect with scholarships that have a clear why behind them. Sharing your family’s story and values authentically builds trust and attracts applicants who align with your mission.
Multi-generational engagement. Consider involving younger family members in outreach, review, or mentorship. This creates peer connection and signals to applicants that your foundation genuinely cares about the next generation.
What happens after the application closes matters too
Building a diverse, inclusive applicant pool is only part of the work. What happens after applications close determines whether that investment pays off.
Applicants from underrepresented backgrounds are more likely to abandon a review process that feels opaque, slow, or inconsistent. If your review process isn’t documented, your timeline isn’t communicated, and your outcomes aren’t tracked, you lose the students you worked hard to attract before you even make a selection.
A few things that preserve the trust you’ve built during outreach:
- Acknowledge receipt of every application promptly
- Communicate your review timeline clearly and hold to it
- Notify all applicants of the outcome, not just the selected scholars
- Track completion rates and year-over-year changes so you can see whether your inclusive design is producing more mission-aligned applicants over time
If you’re managing this process in spreadsheets, the documentation burden grows quickly as your applicant pool diversifies. Your foundation consistently delivers on the inclusive promise it makes during outreach when the operational infrastructure exists to back it up: clear records, communicated timelines, and outcomes your board can actually see.
Conclusion
A family foundation that designs for inclusion (in its language, its application, its outreach, and its review process) attracts the students it set out to serve. That is not just a mission outcome. It is an operational one. Your board can see who applied, who completed the process, and whether your program is reaching the students your eligibility criteria were designed for.
That clarity is what distinguishes a scholarship program your foundation is proud to report on from one that raises more questions than it answers every year.
FAQs: Family Foundation Scholarships: How to Attract a More Diverse Pool of Applicants
The most common reasons are language, visibility, and application design. Formal or institutional language signals to many students that a scholarship wasn’t designed for them, even when they are fully eligible. Programs that rely only on scholarship databases for promotion often miss the students they most want to reach. And applications that require professional formatting, lengthy essays, or hard-to-access formats create friction that falls disproportionately on students with fewer resources. Addressing all three, not just promotion, is what produces a more diverse applicant pool.
Yes. An inaccessible application shuts out qualified students who use assistive technologies or require alternative formats. Best practices include ensuring compatibility with screen readers, providing alt text for images, avoiding time limits that penalize students with disabilities, allowing applicants to save progress and return later, and including a clear process for requesting accommodations. According to the CDC, 1 in 4 adults in the United States lives with a disability, making accessibility essential rather than optional.
Write at an 8th-grade reading level, use second-person language (you and your rather than applicants must), and lead with your family’s mission and story rather than credentials and qualifications. Avoid gatekeeping phrases like “must demonstrate extraordinary leadership” in favor of specific, human prompts like “tell us how you’ve made a difference in your school, home, or community.” When asking for sensitive information such as income or family background, explain why you’re asking and how the information will be used.
The most effective channels for reaching underrepresented students are trusted intermediaries rather than broad marketing. These include guidance counselors at high schools in underserved communities, HBCUs, HSIs, and tribal colleges, community-based organizations working directly with your target population, and past scholarship recipients who can speak authentically about the program. Scholarship databases extend reach but tend to attract broad traffic rather than mission-aligned applicants. Promoting in multiple languages and on mobile-friendly platforms also helps reach students who may not engage through traditional channels.
Offering format flexibility is one of the most practical ways to reduce barriers for underrepresented applicants. Allowing students to submit essays in text, video, or visual formats means that students who communicate more effectively in spoken or visual formats are not penalized. It also reduces the advantage that students with access to essay coaches and professional formatting support have over those without. The goal is to surface genuine potential and mission alignment, not to reward presentation.
Trust is built across multiple cycles, not just during outreach. Feature diverse past recipients in your communications, publish data about who has benefited from your scholarships, and commit to continuous improvement through applicant feedback. Your selection committee matters too: panels that reflect diverse perspectives, include past scholars or community members, and train reviewers on bias reduction signal that your foundation’s commitment to equity extends beyond the application window. Consistently communicating timelines, acknowledging every application, and notifying all applicants of outcomes also preserves trust built during outreach.
A blind review process removes identifying information such as name, demographic details, or school affiliation from applications before reviewers score them, reducing the potential for unconscious bias to influence selections. It is worth considering for family foundations that want to ensure their selection criteria are applied consistently and that the process can withstand scrutiny from board members or external auditors. Blind review works best alongside a clear scoring rubric and reviewer training on equitable evaluation practices.
Related reading: